TRANSFORMATIONAL POTENTIAL OF A CLASSICAL UNIVERSITY MODEL

Vasyl Kremеn

doi:10.28925/2518-7635.2016.1.1

Автор(и)

Vasyl Kremеn http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5459-1318

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.28925/2518-7635.2016.1.1

Ключові слова:

university, research university, entrepreneurial university, corporate university, commercialization, innovative civilization

Анотація

The given article is about the major challenges of university education in the ХХІ century. One of them is the innovative tendencies in modern civilization, which can be matched by a rapid spread of research universities. Another challenge is deep commercialization of university life in the context of globalization. Thus, entrepreneurial and corporate universities can become alternative forms of university life which are emerging in response to the above mentioned processes.

Завантаження

Дані завантаження ще не доступні.

Біографія автора

Vasyl Kremеn

Doctor of Sciences in Philosophy, Professor Full member (Academician) of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine Full Member (Academician) of the National Academy of Educational Sciences of Ukraine President of the National Academy of Educational Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine

Посилання

Buravoy, M. (2014). Phenomenon of inequality: challenges for university education (conversation was hold by Sergiy Kurbatov). Retrieved from http:// www.philosopheducation.com/images/Files/PDF/2014_issue_2/2_15_9.pdf

Gadamer, H.-G. (2002). The idea of the University – yesterday, today and tomorrow. The idea of the university: Anthology. Lviv: Litopys.

Humboldt, W. (2002). On the internal and external organization of higher academic institutions in Berlin. The idea: Anthology. Lviv: Litopys.

Kurbatov, S. (2014). The phenomenon of the university in the context of time and space challenges: Monograph. Sumy: Universytetska Knyga.

Polyakov, M. (2004). Classical University. Evolution, Current State. Kyiv: Geneza.

Kremen, V. (ed.). The phenomenon of innovations: education, society, culture: monograph. Kyiv: Pedagogichna dumka.

Shnedelbah, H. (2002). Humboldt University. Logos, 5-6 (35), 1-14.

Jaspers, K. (2002). The idea of University. The idea of the university: anthology. Lviv: Litopys.

Altbach, P. (2011). The Road to Academic Excellence: The Making of WorldClass Research Universities.

Academic Ranking of World Universities. Retrieved from http://www. shanghairanking.com/ARWU2016.html

Academic Ranking of World Universities: Statistics. Retrieved from http:// www.shanghairanking.com/ARWU-Statistics-2016.html

Aronowitz, S., Giroux H. (2000). The Corporate University and the Politics of Education. The Educational Forum, 4, 332-339.

Atkinson, R., Blanpied, W. (2008). Research Universities: Core of the US Science and Technology System. Technology in Society, 30, 30-48.

Carnegie Classifications. Retrieved from http://carnegieclassifications.iu.edu

Etzkowitz, H. (2013). When Knowledge Married Capital: The Birth of Academic Enterprise. Journal of Knowledge-based Innovation in China, 5 (1), 44-59.

Harvard at a Glance. Retrieved from http://www.harvard.edu/ about-harvard/harvard-glance

Hearn, D. An Examination of Corporate University Model. Retrieved from http://www.newfoundations.com/OrgTheory/Hearn721.html

Meister, J. (1998). Corporate Universities: Lessons in Building a World-Class Work Force. McGraw-Hill.

Rademakers, M. (2005). Corporate Universities: Driving Force of Knowledge Innovation. The Journal of Workplace Learning, 17, 130-136.

Rothaermel, F. (2007). University Entrepreneurship: A Taxonomy of the Literature. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16 (4), 691-791.

Scott, J. The Mission of the University: Medieval to Postmodern Transformations. The Journal of Higher Education. Special Issue: Moving into the Next 75 Years, 77 (1), 1-39.