DIGITAL TOOLS SELECTION FOR INCLUSIVE COURSE DESIGN AT UNIVERSITY

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.28925/2617-5266/2025.1014

Keywords:

inclusive learning environment, university ecosystem, inclusive course design, variability, accessibility, digital tools

Abstract

The paper addresses the currently important issues of building an inclusive learning environment at universities and the design of courses
as components of this environment. According to the goals of the work, it explores and elaborates a functional approach to the selection of didactic and digital tools that provide a design of inclusive learning courses based on the universal learning design (UDL) concept associated with neuropsychology. This includes identifying three large scale brain networks, which are responsible for certain aspects of information perception, information processing, and decision-making.
Building on these neuropsychological explorations, we identified the didactic approaches and matched them with the necessary digital tools. This allows for achieving such variability within an inclusive course
design for each component of the learning process (supported by a proper large-scale brain network) and at all three levels. In addition, the paper highlights the experience and preliminary results of the pilot implementation of an online course as a component of a virtual inclusive campus, which was designed based on the elaborated approach. After the course piloting, the key findings were summed up, including the strengths and weaknesses of the course. After the improvements, the course is going to be disseminated to a larger cohort of trainees with follow-up empirical research on the students’ satisfaction, level of accessibility, and learning motivation, which makes a prospect of the research. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Afonso, A., Morgado, L., Carvalho, I. C., & Spilker, M. J. (2025). Facing Challenges in Higher Education: Enhancing Accessibility and Inclusion Through Flexible Learning Design. Education Sciences, 15(8), 1013. https://doi.org/10.3390/ educsci15081013

Álvarez-Chaves, A., & Saborío-Taylor, S. (2025). Hybrid learning in higher education: Considerations for its implementation in course design. Journal of Digital Educational Technology, 5(1), ep2505. https://doi.org/10.30935/jdet/15859

Bindhani, S., Gopinath, G. (2024). Inclusive Education Practices: A Review of Challenges and Successes. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 6(2), 1–9. https://www.ijfmr.com/papers/2024/2/17341.pdf

Denysova, N., & Tsapro, G. (2024). Thesaurus of the lemma ’teacher’ in the academic discourse of online learning: A corpus-based study. The Modern Higher Education Review, 9, 30–51. https://doi.org/10.28925/2617-5266/2024.92

Freels, J., & Sankaranarayanan, R. (2025). Insights at the Nexus of accessibility, instructional design, and student success. Online Learning, 29(3), 158–175. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v29i3.4965

Chamblin, M. (2017). Using the ADAPT strategy to facilitate the thinking process of creating universal design-based instructional adaptions and differentiation in lesson plans for diverse learners. Open Access Library Journal, 4, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1103585

International Disability Alliance (IDA). (2021). Universal Design for Learning and its Role in Ensuring Access to Inclusive Education for All. https://www.internationaldisabilityalliance.org/sites/default/files/universal_design_for_learning_final_8.09.2021.pdf

Moore, S., Rose, D., & Meyer, A. (2007). Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal design for learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55, 521–525. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-007-9056-3

Mohammed, M., & Muesser, N. (2019). Blended learning motivation model for instructors in higher education institutions, International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(12). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0145-2

Mospan, N. V., & Sysoieva, S. O. (2022). Trends in digital adaptation of schools during the COVID-19 pandemic. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, https://doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v91i5.5063

Mospan, N. (2023). Trends in emergency higher education digital transformation during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 20(1), 50–70. https://doi.org/10.53761/1.20.01.04

Ren, W., Wang, R., Nor, S.A.M., Mao, Ch., & Harutyunyan, H. (2024). Factors influencing students’ learning satisfaction and students’ learning outcomes in blended learning. International Journal of Education and Practice, 12(1). 95–108. https://doi.org/10.18488/61.v12i1.3624

Rudnik, Y. (2022). Teacher students training to implement AR and VR technologies in foreign language teaching. The Modern Higher Education Review, 7, 84–93. https://doi.org/10.28925/25187635.2022.78

Schott, F., & Seel, N. M. (2015). Instructional design. In Wright, J. (Ed.) (2012). International Encyclopedia of Social and Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Oxford: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.92032-4

Semerikov, S.O., Nechypurenko, P.P., Vakaliuk, T.A., Mintii, I.S., & Fadieieva, L.O. (2025). Differential effects of Moodle course design on student subpopulations: advancing personalized learning in higher education. Smart Learning Environment, 12, 46. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-025-00400-6

Smith, P.L, & Ragan, T. J. (2005). A framework for instructional design. In P.L. Smith & T.J. Ragan(Eds.), Instructional Design (3rd ed., pp. 127–150). New York, NY: Wiley & Sons

Priyadharsini, V., & Sahaya, M. (2024). Universal Design for Learning (UDL) in inclusive education: Accelerating learning for all. Shanlax International Journal of Arts, Science and Humanities, 11(4), 2024, 145–50. https://doi.org/10.34293/sijash.v11i4.7489

Vergara, D., Bosque, A., García-Sardón E., & Fernández-Arias, P. (2025). Universal accessibility and engineering: A 21st-century bibliometric review and SDG links. World, 6(4), 152. https://doi.org/10.3390/world6040152

Vieriu, A. M. (2025). Inclusive education as a pillar of sustainability: An experimental study on students’ attitudes towards people with disabilities. Education Science, 15(11), 1522. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15111522

Wakefield, M. (2018). Universal design for learning guidelines version 2.2 [graphic organizer]. https://mtsac.libguides.com/udl/principles

Downloads


Abstract views: 14

Published

2025-12-24

How to Cite

Bilousova, L., & Gryzun, L. (2025). DIGITAL TOOLS SELECTION FOR INCLUSIVE COURSE DESIGN AT UNIVERSITY. The Modern Higher Education Review, (10), 318–347. https://doi.org/10.28925/2617-5266/2025.1014

Issue

Section

DISTANCE LEARNING AND DIGITAL TOOLS IMPLEMENTATION