«FOUR – “I”» MODEL: LEVELS OF INTEREST DEVELOPMENT IN TEACHING PROFESSION
Keywords:teaching profession, teaching profession orientation, «Four – “I”» model, signs of interest, indicators of interest, Post-Millennials, Zoomers, development of interest, high school students
The article is devoted to the study of different approaches to obtaining a teaching profession and considering development of interest in teaching profession. Choosing development of interest in teaching profession as the object of this article, the author intends to compare different approaches and interpretations of the above term in educational process and professional orientation. Changing in teaching profession standards and new challenges of time became the basis for new approach to the process of professional orientation and caused additional study of the latest generation called Post- Millennials or Zoomers in different sources. Analysis of the latest generation characteristics by different scientists and research groups became the basis of rethinking previous experience in teaching profession orientation of high school students. Changes in life environment, new approaches to education process, new generation grown up are taken into account in current study. As a result, a «Four – “I”» model: Levels of Interest development in teaching profession” is created and signs of interest in teaching profession were specified for Zoomers. Additionally, six indicators of interest development in teaching activity are determined to clarify further teaching profession orientation process.
Ainley, M. (2017). Interest: Knowns, unknowns, and basic processes. In O’Keefe, P. A. & Harackiewicz, J. M. (Eds.). The Science of Interest (pp. 3–24). New York, NY: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55509-6_1
Blaschke, L. M. (2012). Heutagogy and lifelong learning: A review of heutagogical practice and self-determined learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13(13). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v13i1.1076
Cook, V. S. (2019). Generation Z Engaged in the Classroom. Retrieved from https://wcetfrontiers.org/2019/03/06/generation-z-engaged-in-the-classroom/
Dimock, M. (2018). Defining generations: Where Millennials end and Generation Z begins. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/01/17/where-millennials-end-and-generation-z-begins/
Eldridge, A. (2022). Generation Z: Demographic group. Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/topic/Generation-Z
Francis, F. & Hoefel, F. (2018). ‘True Gen’: Generation Z and its implications for companies. https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/consumer-packaged-goods/our-insights/true-gen-generation-z-and-its-implications-for-companies
Fry, R., & Parker, K. (2018). Early benchmarks show ‘post-millennials’ on track to be most diverse, best-educated generation yet : A demographic portrait of today’s 6- to 21-year-olds. Pew research center. https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2018/11/15/early-benchmarks-show-post-millennials-on-track-to-be-most-diverse-best-educated-generation-yet/
Hidi, S. (1990). Interest and its contribution as a mental resource for learning. Review of Educational Research, 60(4), 549–71. https://doi.org/10.2307/1170506
Hidi, S., & Ainley, M. (2008). Interest and self-regulation: Relationships between two variables that influence learning. In Schunk, D. H. & Zimmerman, B. J. (Eds.), Motivation and Self-Regulated Learning: Theory, Research, and Application (pp. 77–109). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-Phase Model of Interest Development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111–27. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4.
Iran-Nejad, A. (1987). Cognitive and affective causes of interest and liking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(2), 120–30. DOI: 10.1037/0022-06220.127.116.11.
Ivaniuk, I. V., & Ovcharuk, O. V. (2021). Problems and needs of teachers in the organization of distance learning in Ukraine during quarantine caused by COVID-19 pandemic: 2021 research results. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 85(5), 29–4. https://doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v85i5.4669
Kaminska, M. (2019). Trends in Continuing Education of Teachers in European Education Systems. The Modern Higher Education Review, 3. https://doi.org/10.28925/2518-7635.2018.3.5
Mospan, N. (2016). Teacher education graduates in Ukraine: Current state of play. Cogent Education, 3, 1–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2016.1221192
Mospan, N. V., & Sysoieva, S. O. (2022). Trends in digital adaptation of schools during the COVID-19 pandemic. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 91(5), 21–35. https://doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v91i5.5063
Order “On adoption of Professional Standard for professions: “Teacher of primary school classes of secondary educational institution”, “Teacher of secondary educational institution”, Teacher of primary school” (№ 2736, 2020). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/rada/show/v2736915-20#Text
Renninger, K. A. (2009). Interest and identity development in instruction: An inductive model. Educational Psychologist, 44(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520902832392.
Rotgans, J. I., & Schmidt, H. G. (2017). Interest development: Arousing situational interest affects the growth trajectory of individual interest. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 49, 175–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2017.02.003
Sysoieva, S., & Sokolova, I. (2018). Teacher Educators: From “The Hidden Profession” to Revealed Profession. The Modern Higher Education Review, 2. https://doi.org/10.28925/2518-7635.2017.2.3
Stacey, M. (2020). The Business of Teaching: Becoming a Teacher in a Market of Schools. Springer Nature. Switzerland AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35407-7
Zhernosiek, I. P. (1998). Scientific-methodical work in secondary school (pp.49–53). IZMN
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2023 The Modern Higher Education Review
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.